Proposals for MLPA include Del Mar

A new marine reserve is proposed off the coast of Del Mar as part of a statewide effort to improve marine ecosystem conservation known as the Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) Initiative.

The proposed reserve would prohibit commercial and recreational fishing from the San Dieguito river mouth to the Penasquitos river mouth, from the beach to the state water line about 3.5 miles out to sea – a total of about 10.8 square miles.

Del Mar was targeted for its rocky habitat in very deep water, which provides shelter for the rockhut fish, and because it is not as popular a fishing spot for commercial fishermen.

“We’re trying to get a balance between protecting habitat and at the same time minimizing the economic impact on the fishermen,” said Dave Rudie, owner of Catalina Offshore Products and a member of the MLPA stakeholder group that is developing the proposals for marine protected areas in Southern California.

The stakeholder group has 64 members representing conservationists, commercial fishing, recreational angling and diving, ports, harbors, the government and various business entities.

They have been meeting since last October to develop a comprehensive network of marine parks, reserves and conservation areas to protect sensitive habitats from overfishing, as required by the Marine Life Protection Act.

The law, passed in 1999, calls for the overhaul of the state’s existing system of marine protected areas because only 14 of the 220,000 square miles of the state and federal waters off the state’s coast were actually no-take zones at that time.

The stakeholder group has developed four proposals with different locations for protected areas from Point Conception in Santa Barbara County down to the U.S.-Mexico border; all but one includes Del Mar as a reserve.

“If they want to protect biodiversity and naturally abundant marine ecosystems, they’re picking one of the worst spots for that,” said Mark Rathsam, the Del Mar lifeguard deputy chief.

The habitat off Del Mar is dominated by sand, and lacks the shallow rocky reefs and thriving kelp forests that attract a greater number and diversity of fish and marine life, Rathsam said.

“We don’t have big populations of fish in Del Mar, we don’t have the structure for that,” he said.

Kate Hanley, director of marine conservation for San Diego Coastkeeper, agrees. That’s why she, as a member of the MLPA stakeholder group, recommended not putting a reserve at Del Mar, but rather targeting the rocky reefs and kelp forests off Encinitas and La Jolla.

“We’re trying to create underwater parks, similar to Yosemite or Yellowstone,” Hanley said. “There’s a reason why Yosemite and Yellowstone are not in a dust bowl.”

The stakeholder group will continue to refine their proposals and present them to the MLPA Blue Ribbon Task Force later this year. The task force will review the proposals and make a recommendation in early 2010 to the Department of Fish and Game, which has final approval.

The proposed Del Mar reserve is also raising concerns about the ability to dredge the high quality sand there for regional beach nourishment projects. It is also unclear if the reserve would prohibit placing sand on the beach or sand retention structures, said Adam Birnbaum, Del Mar planning manager.

While not a popular spot for commercial fishermen, between five and 20 fishermen often line Del Mar’s shore in the early morning, Rathsam said.

Harold Ballon, who has been fishing Del Mar for more than 20 years, was not pleased to hear about the proposed no-take reserve.

“That would be horrible,” said Ballon, who fishes a few times per week.

Fisherman Ed Krebs said he would be disappointed if the reserve were approved, but would go somewhere else to fish. He said recreational fishermen like him and Ballon do not have a significant impact on the ecosystem.

“The porpoises running up and down the beach probably catch 10 times the amount of fish we do,” Krebs said.

The public is invited to provide input on the proposed marine protected areas. Comments can be submitted in writing or during public comment at the next stakeholder group meeting, which is Aug. 3 and 4 in Carlsbad. For more information, visit www.dfg.ca.gov/mlpa.

Related posts:

  1. Marine protection plan in the works
  2. Be heard at meeting on Marine Protected Areas
  3. Pacific marine monuments a great step forward
  4. Plan for offshore ‘farm’ detailed
  5. Proposals joined by new trends and traditions

Short URL: http://www.delmartimes.net/?p=5880

Posted by pjpent on Jul 23, 2009. Filed under Archives. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

Leave a Reply

Archives

Facebook

Bottom Buttons 1

Bottom Buttons 2

Bottom Buttons 3

Bottom Buttons 4

Bottom Buttons 5

Bottom Buttons 6

LA JOLLA NEWS

RSS LA JOLLA NEWS

  • 10 Reasons to Generate Your Own Power
    By Martin Learn, Home Energy Systems As we take one step closer towards August, we all prepare for the blazing sun, the heat it brings, and in turn, the cranked-up AC. But instead of seeing the sun as an enemy, something to be protected against, there is a way to embrace that solar power and […]
  • La Jolla Community Calendar July 24-31
    La Jolla Concerts by the Sea continue 2-4 p.m. Sunday, July 27 with the Bill Magee Blues Band, performing electric New York and Chicago-style blues (preview at BillMageeBlues.com). Scripps Park at La Jolla Cove. Free. (858) 454-1600. LJConcertsByTheSea.org […]
  • FRONTLINE CANCER: The value of Comprehensive Cancer Centers
    It’s estimated that approximately 14 million Americans alive today have had cancer. Some are cancer-free; some are still fighting it. This year, they will be joined by another 1.6 million persons who will receive that fearful diagnosis. The grim news, of course, is that the ranks of cancer patients are also trimmed each year by death: More than 585,000 annua […]

RANCHO SANTA FE NEWS

RANCHO SANTA FE NEWS

RSS RANCHO SANTA FE NEWS