Opinion: Santa Fe Irrigation District: the $16,300 question

For the past four months, local ratepayers have attended Santa Fe Irrigation District board meetings and have repeatedly requested that the board take a roll call vote regarding all aspects of board compensation (health & dental insurance, per diem reimbursement, and other expenses). At each board meeting, ratepayers speaking during “public comments” have been rebuffed and/or told that board compensation was not a “current agenda item.” Finally, after the Jan. 20 board meeting, we were informed that board member compensation is now scheduled for discussion at the upcoming Feb. 17 board meeting. Why all the stonewalling for the past four months?

Answer: $16,300

At least we believe that is part of the answer. Just prior to the Jan. 20 board meeting, we learned in writing from the SFID office that our new director, Andy Menshek, “has enrolled his family (defined as employee plus two or more family members) for medical and dental insurance coverage through SFID. The annual cost is approximately $16,300.”

As we have learned from attending SFID board meetings, Director Menshek currently has other full-time employment with one of the local San Diego-area fire districts, and although he has insurance available through this employment, he has chosen to take insurance benefits from the SFID instead! Insurance benefits at SFID must be even better than those offered by the fire district…

Suggested Board Compensation Changes
Several members of the community are pursuing fiscal changes to the way SFID is being managed by its board members. While we agree that board member expenses represent a small amount compared to total costs of the water district, we feel it is the most important place to begin getting the district’s fiscal house in better order.

It is time for our board members to lead by example, for that will set the attitude for a wide range of fiscal changes that need to occur. It’s time to end the era of entitlements and put more reasonable fiscal policies in place, starting with these two policy changes:

1) Board member health & dental coverage: Should be eliminated
• Board members are not employees of the SFID, they work for the district part-time, on a per diem basis. Insurance benefits are normally restricted to full-time employees, so a legal loop-hole must exist. We feel strongly that there is not a fiscally defensible reason to offer “free” insurance to any board member. Several other local water districts do not provide “free” insurance; neither should the SFID.
• All board members currently have elected to receive “free” insurance benefits from the SFID. If they desire to maintain this coverage, each should pay the entire cost themselves, similar to the policy in other water districts.

2) Board member reimbursement: Should be eliminated or capped
• In addition to free insurance, as reported in the RSF Review, two current board members have each received more than $18,000 in the past year for per diem and expense reimbursement; an amount that seems unnecessarily high when you compare this to other water districts whose entire five-member board expenses are $10,500 (Valley Center).
• If board members will not serve freely, first reduce the per diem amount from $200 to $100. Then a cap of $4,000 per year per board member allows for an average of two meetings per month (24 x $100 = $2,400), plus $1,600 for travel and meetings.
• We also feel that there should be no reimbursement for board members’ phone/fax/office supplies.
Attend the Feb. 17 public meeting to discuss board member compensation

As members of our community, if you want to help the district become more fiscally responsive, please plan to either attend the next SFID water board meeting on Feb. 17 to make your public comments regarding what you believe is “fair” compensation for our SFID board members (you are allowed three minutes each meeting), or alternatively write a letter with your views.

If you want to achieve change, other readers and ratepayers like yourself must also choose to get involved.

Fellow Santa Fe Irrigation District ratepayers,
William Bauce
Brad Burnett
Otto Dieffenbach
Barbara Edwards
Greg & Anne Gruzdowich
Carlie Headapohl
Cathy Hopf
Dr. & Mrs. Charlie Jones
Mike & Kathi Mallick
Robin & Gerald Parsky
Connie Pittard
Helen Reed
Sue Sanderson
Owen Strange
Sam & Joanne Ursini

Related posts:

  1. Solana Beach: Residents ask Santa Fe Irrigation District for more cost cuts
  2. Solana Beach: Santa Fe Irrigation District member defends attendance of conference
  3. Santa Fe Irrigation district board approves water rate hike
  4. Opinion: Critics of Santa Fe Irrigation District are not employees’ enemies
  5. Water district to hold series of public workshop meetings

Short URL: http://www.delmartimes.net/?p=21437

Posted by admin on Feb 11, 2011. Filed under Letters, Solana Beach. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

Leave a Reply



Bottom Buttons 1

Bottom Buttons 2

Bottom Buttons 3

Bottom Buttons 4

Bottom Buttons 5

Bottom Buttons 6