Carmel Valley planning board rejects new redistricting plan

Karen Billing
Staff Writer

At its June 23 meeting, the Carmel Valley Community Planning Board voted unanimously to send a letter to the city’s 2010 Redistricting Commission opposing a new proposal that splits Carmel Valley from La Jolla and realigns it instead to the east with Rancho Penasquitos, Rancho Bernardo and as far as San Pasqual.

The proposal, called “Empowerment Through Equality,” drawn up by Ryan Trabaco of the Clairemont Town Council, “severs” the Carmel Valley community, leaving out neighborhoods 10, 6, 8 and divides a school district.

Not only does it leave out a chunk of Carmel Valley but the plan doesn’t appear to make sense geographically, according to the Carmel Valley planning board.

“The east to west link doesn’t make sense with the character of our community,” said board member Rick Newman, who said it makes more sense to align with coastal areas.

In the letter, the board will reiterate its support for the Coast and Canyons map which keeps both La Jolla and Carmel Valley in District 1, preserving a district composed of communities that share like interest.

The seven-member commission is in the process of creating its proposed map, which will be followed by a round of public hearings before being finalized in August.

Open seats on planning board
The Carmel Valley Community Planning Board is looking to fill two vacant seats on its board: a representative for neighborhood 5 and a representative for Pacific Highlands Ranch district 12.
Neighborhood 5 includes the area near Carmel Del Mar School. It encompasses the area north of SR-56, east of Carmel Creek Road and south of Carmel Country Road.
District 12 in Pacific Highlands Ranch is the neighborhood south of Del Mar Heights Road and east of Village Center Loop.
Candidates are exempt from the two-meeting attendance requirement and will be appointed by Chair Frisco White rather than participate in an election. If interested, contact White at white@wwarch.com.

Related posts:

  1. Carmel Valley planning board backs ‘Coast and Canyons’ redistricting plan
  2. Carmel Valley Community Planning Board has eight seats available
  3. Carmel Valley planning board voices opposition to group’s proposal to move Carmel Valley to another district
  4. Carmel Valley area planning group creates panel to study redistricting
  5. Carmel Valley planning board unsympathetic to fairgrounds board position

Short URL: http://www.delmartimes.net/?p=25221

Posted by Karen Billing on Jul 7, 2011. Filed under Carmel Valley, News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

Leave a Reply

Archives

Facebook

Bottom Buttons 1

Bottom Buttons 2

Bottom Buttons 3

Bottom Buttons 4

Bottom Buttons 5

Bottom Buttons 6

LA JOLLA NEWS

RANCHO SANTA FE NEWS

RANCHO SANTA FE NEWS

RSS RANCHO SANTA FE NEWS

  • Community input received on proposed health club and pool facility in Rancho Santa Fe
    About 100 Rancho Santa Fe residents showed up on Friday, Oct. 17, for a health club and pool community meeting, the last outreach before ballots were mailed on Monday, Oct. 20. On the ballots, members are being asked whether the Rancho Santa Fe Association should spend $350,000 on a professional planning phase for the potential new community amenity. RSF Ass […]
  • Czech violin duo to perform at Village Church in Rancho Santa Fe
    In cooperation with the Consulate General of the Czech Republic, the Czech School San Diego hosts a free classical violin concert by internationally recognized Czech violin player Jaroslav Svecený and his daughter, Julie Svecená, who are on a tour of the United States. The concert will be at 7 p.m. Oct. 27 in the Village Church. The father-daughter duo will […]
  • Rancho Santa Fe weekly sports update
    Torrey Pines defeated Canyon Crest Academy 4-3 in a Palomar League opener for both teams on Oct. 9. Alayna Tomlinson and Farah Farjood each scored two goals to lead the Falcons. Samantha “Sammy” Cirino added one goal and one assist. […]