Spanish program ends at Del Mar Heights school after board vote

The Jan. 18 school board meeting drew a large crowd. Photo/Bill Morris

By Karen Billing

The Del Mar Heights School Spanish program ended Jan. 20, following a Del Mar School District board vote of 4-1 on Jan. 18.

The underlying issue the decision was based on was the role PTA (parent-teacher association) fundraising plays versus Del Mar Schools Education Foundation fundraising.

Simply put: According to district rules, people come from the foundation, programs come from the PTA.

The board was placed in a difficult position as Del Mar Heights parents donated more than $15,000 with the intent of paying for a Spanish teacher, which was perceived by the board to be a consultant, not a teacher. District superintendent Jim Peabody admitted “full blame” in thinking that it was an after-school Spanish program, as it had been the previous year, not a class that would be taught during school hours.

As a result of the board’s approval of what they thought was just a consultant, Mary Zobell has been teaching Spanish at the Heights since the beginning of the school year. Now, per the board’s vote not to approve her performance agreement, the Heights Spanish program ended on Jan. 20.

Peabody said it is inappropriate for an independent contractor or “professional expert” to act as an employee and the Spanish teacher did not meet IRS requirements as a consultant.

The vote was painful, most noticeably for board president Scott Wooden, and the trustees tried to find some way to be able to keep the program or save it from being cut mid-year. The only option would be to offer a contract, but as trustee Doug Rafner pointed out, that would not be fair to the other schools.

“The message that is sent to other schools in the district is that to get funding, just give to the PTA and you can get whatever you want. That’s not how things can happen. This employee wasn’t brought in through the front door. ‘Professional expert’ doesn’t tell me she’s a teacher,” said Rafner. “We look like we have egg on our face and we look silly for turning away a fully-funded program but our obligation has to be to the entire district.”

Trustee Doug Perkins was the sole vote in support of renewing the performance agreement.

“This would be an easier decision to make if this was at the beginning or end of the school year,” Perkins said, noting that because of the misunderstanding and that the students have had Spanish for half of the year, they should work on finding a way to fix the problem instead of cutting the program.

The Heights Spanish program can still be allowed at the school but only during after- school hours, as an enrichment program.

Peabody reported having received 54 emails and one letter from parents on the subject, including two emails from Del Mar Hills parents addressing a rumor that they caused the Heights program to be cancelled.

“I can assure everyone that’s not the case,” Peabody said. “It was a request from the board to get an update on PTA and DMSEF fundraising, and the Spanish performance agreement was terminating on Jan. 20 and the board was required to approve a new one.”

Upon hearing that their program could be cut, a large crowd of Del Mar Heights parents came to the meeting in support of Spanish and their school’s goal to create a global village.

Parents told stories of how much their children loved Spanish and were sad to see it go—Tamar Gollan said her daughter almost started to cry when told the program would no longer be available.

Parents said that Spanish was more than just learning a second language; it had given their children an appreciation for a culture that is very engrained in the San Diego community. Parents told anecdotes of students recognizing Spanish art and styles, coming home singing Spanish songs and speaking the language with a fine-tuned accent.

“This isn’t just a ‘nice to have’ program, I think it can be a very interesting opportunity for our students in this state,” said parent Jennifer Crittendon, noting over 30 percent of the population speaks Spanish in their home and the state’s Hispanic population is 40 percent and growing.

Parent Katherine White lamented some of the programs besides Spanish that the district has lost, such as instrumental bands.

“It’s time to stop losing programs,” White said “We need to find a way to make this all work…We’re a great district but we can be greater.”

Wooden said that while it’s true that the district has lost some programs, it’s because of the foundation that they have been able to keep some programs that other schools “can’t even dream about having,” such as music and art.

Since 2009, the district has operated on the model that DMSEF monies come in and are allocated throughout the district schools. Each school site makes the decision on how to split up the money between music/art, PE, science and technology. Spanish used to be a part of ESC but the board decided to remove it in 2009.

“Every school in 2009 offered Spanish and we did away with Spanish as ESC,” said Comischell Rodriguez. “We are not saying goodbye to Spanish tonight.”

Rodriguez said she was insulted to be in this position because it was made very clear to the principals what the formula was. She recalled PE teachers who attempted to save their jobs when their ESC time was reduced in 2009 and parents weren’t able to fund their contracts or allow them to come back.

“There’s egg on the district’s face because we have to abide by the law and it doesn’t feel good at all,” Rodriguez said.

Trustee Doug Perkins wondered whether it still made sense for the district to operate under those same foundation guidelines for parity.

“I’m looking at a three-year-old policy and seeing if there’s a better way to do it and I think there is. I fear that the equity model loses ground to a site-based model,” Perkins said, expressing an idea about incentivizing schools to increase giving and once they hit that incentive they could take site-based revenue for something additional. “It’s sad that we’re going backward and eliminating programs.”

Trustee Kristin Gibson agreed that the foundation policy may deserve a fresh look but said that for now, the board couldn’t operate outside the policies until they officially changed them.

Related posts:

  1. Employee incentives up for discussion in Del Mar school district
  2. Del Mar Heights school advances students’ tech education with iTouch Learning program
  3. Rowe finding success with Spanish language program
  4. Del Mar school district board discusses emergency preparedness plan
  5. Last meeting a time of reflection for outgoing Del Mar school board trustees

Short URL:

Posted by Staff on Jan 19, 2012. Filed under Carmel Valley, Del Mar, Featured Story, News, Schools, carmel valley. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

6 Comments for “Spanish program ends at Del Mar Heights school after board vote”

  1. Sad Parent

    What a sad day in Del Mar/Carmel Valley!

    Another program is taken away from our schools, another valuable teacher put back to the street, and a community further tortured by a School Board discussion that had nothing to do with the value of our children’s education, but rather focused itself on bi-laws and policy.
    In the end, a decision was made by passive excuse rather than focused upon looking for alternative solutions. Can anyone tell me if anything positive came from this? Did our children gain anything at all? The answer is obviously no, and as the School Board was so concentrated on acting like lawyers and accountants, the Del Mar/Carmel Valley community lost something valuable last night.
    My children lost their second language education, they lost a teacher they have learned to love and respect, and they lost a program that they have dedicated years into, something that was part of their everyday life.
    This topic became a discussion about rules, policy and finances…and should have been about values, education and our children. Shame on those who incorrectly set up this year’s program, making promises and commitments to the parents and the children involved. Shame on those who approved this situation and allowed it to continue halfway into the school year, only now abandoning it without accountability. And finally, shame on the School Board and our Superintendent for using policy as an excuse for losing a valuable program like this…rather than proactively coming to the table last night with alternatives and strong leadership that would show our community that they truly care about our children’s education.

    What a sad day indeed!

  2. Responsible parent

    Shame on those who set up the funding for a program that does not fit within the rules. During school hours? Bravo to the Board for abiding by the rules.
    I agree that second language education is critical to our kid's development. Then let's change the rules/policies/bylaws, get the funding and add it back to the ESC programs. We spend too much time complaining, placing blame and making excuses. Let's raise the money and get it added back to the ESC program.

  3. Parent

    Shame on the principal of the the Heights, who knew full well what the policies and practices of the district were, yet still put the hearts and monies of the families of her school on the line by pushing forward a program she knew to be in conflict with said policies. I feel for the families and children affected by her careless disregard. The principal set them up for failure.

  4. Parent

    The Board's hands were tied. The rules were broken and they had to end it. Peabody should have known what was going on and stopped it before school started. It is a shame to end the program, but the rules were broken. Now, let's change the rules. District-wide fundraising doesn't seem to work here. It is a by product of a Super that was quickly fired. Let's re-vamp it and give schools back the ability to raise money for themselves.

    • another parent

      we are a district. we rise and fall together. i think site-based fundraising would reopen the pandora's box of discord our district suffered through the last few years. it was pretty painful, and its best we not go back to that.

    • Max

      "The board has the option if they so choose … to hire Mary as a temporary employee through the end of the year and continue the program,” Peabody said.

      The board's hands were not tied.

Leave a Reply



Bottom Buttons 1

Bottom Buttons 2

Bottom Buttons 3

Bottom Buttons 4

Bottom Buttons 5

Bottom Buttons 6





  • Alumni and Advancement Center named for longtime supporters Larry and Cindy Bloch of Rancho Santa Fe
    The University of Rochester’s Alumni and Advancement Center in Rochester, N.Y. has been renamed the Larry and Cindy Bloch Alumni and Advancement Center in recognition of the couple’s support of the university and, in particular, its Advancement programs. In a ceremony on Wednesday, Oct. 15, UR President Joel Seligman formally dedicated the center in honor of […]
  • RSF Association Board Biz: It’s fire season: Be prepared
    The Rancho Santa Fe Fire Protection District (RSFFPD) was officially formed in 1946, in the aftermath of a devastating fire that took place in 1943 and destroyed brush, farmland and homes from Rancho Bernardo through Rancho Santa Fe, all the way to Solana Beach and Del Mar. Today the Fire District spans 38 square miles and protects nearly 30,000 residents. W […]
  • Rancho Santa Fe couple lead way in helping those with thyroid disorders
    Few people may know that Graves’ disease is one of the most common autoimmune diseases afflicting Americans today. Fewer still may know that the only national non-profit dedicated to its patients is headquartered in Rancho Santa Fe. The Graves’ Disease and Thyroid Foundation, co-chaired by Rancho Santa Fe residents Kathleen Bell Flynn and Steve Flynn, has be […]