<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Study shows success of red light cameras in Solana Beach</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delmartimes.net/2012/01/27/study-shows-success-of-red-light-cameras-in-solana-beach/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delmartimes.net/2012/01/27/study-shows-success-of-red-light-cameras-in-solana-beach/</link>
	<description>The Latest News from the Community of Del Mar</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:47:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.delmartimes.net/2012/01/27/study-shows-success-of-red-light-cameras-in-solana-beach/#comment-466211</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delmartimes.mscsddev.com/?p=31034#comment-466211</guid>
		<description>A better title for this article would be &quot;Beneficiaries of red-light camera revenues produce dodgy statistics to justify unpopular program&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A better title for this article would be &quot;Beneficiaries of red-light camera revenues produce dodgy statistics to justify unpopular program&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.delmartimes.net/2012/01/27/study-shows-success-of-red-light-cameras-in-solana-beach/#comment-466130</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delmartimes.mscsddev.com/?p=31034#comment-466130</guid>
		<description>Study this.  
  
The cameras (indirectly) block emergency vehicles - because cars stopped at a camera hesitate to get out of the way! Other side effects: Rearenders, $$$ sent to Oz, AZ or Goldman-Sachs, where it won&#039;t come back, and tourists and shoppers driven away.   
Worse, a false expectation of safety, because cameras can&#039;t stop the real late runners, who cause the accidents. (If cameras worked, camera sellers wouldn&#039;t have the videos of crashes they pass around.)  
Want safety, no side effects?  
To cut car/pedestrian accidents, train your kids not to step out just &#039;cuz the walk sign came on.   
To cut nuisance running (a fraction of a second late), lengthen the yellows. It&#039;s cheap to do so can be done all over town.   
The dangerous real late (multiple seconds) runs won&#039;t be stopped by the mere presence of a camera, because the runner won&#039;t know (a lost tourist) or won&#039;t remember (a distracted or impaired &quot;local&quot;) that there&#039;s a camera up ahead.  They&#039;re not doing it on purpose! To cut the real late runs, improve the visual cues that say, &quot;Intersection ahead.&quot; Florida&#039;s DOT found that better pavement markings (paint!) cut running by up to 74%. Make the signal lights bigger, add backboards, and put the poles on the NEAR side of the corner. Put brighter bulbs in the street lights at intersections. Put up lighted name signs for the cross streets.   
Who needs cameras and their side effects? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Study this.  </p>
<p>The cameras (indirectly) block emergency vehicles &#8211; because cars stopped at a camera hesitate to get out of the way! Other side effects: Rearenders, $$$ sent to Oz, AZ or Goldman-Sachs, where it won&#039;t come back, and tourists and shoppers driven away.<br />
Worse, a false expectation of safety, because cameras can&#039;t stop the real late runners, who cause the accidents. (If cameras worked, camera sellers wouldn&#039;t have the videos of crashes they pass around.)<br />
Want safety, no side effects?<br />
To cut car/pedestrian accidents, train your kids not to step out just &#039;cuz the walk sign came on.<br />
To cut nuisance running (a fraction of a second late), lengthen the yellows. It&#039;s cheap to do so can be done all over town.<br />
The dangerous real late (multiple seconds) runs won&#039;t be stopped by the mere presence of a camera, because the runner won&#039;t know (a lost tourist) or won&#039;t remember (a distracted or impaired &quot;local&quot;) that there&#039;s a camera up ahead.  They&#039;re not doing it on purpose! To cut the real late runs, improve the visual cues that say, &quot;Intersection ahead.&quot; Florida&#039;s DOT found that better pavement markings (paint!) cut running by up to 74%. Make the signal lights bigger, add backboards, and put the poles on the NEAR side of the corner. Put brighter bulbs in the street lights at intersections. Put up lighted name signs for the cross streets.<br />
Who needs cameras and their side effects?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
