<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Del Mar City Council takes a step back on tightening of standards for downtown commercial projects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delmartimes.net/2013/02/20/del-mar-city-council-takes-a-step-back-on-tightening-of-standards-for-downtown-commercial-projects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delmartimes.net/2013/02/20/del-mar-city-council-takes-a-step-back-on-tightening-of-standards-for-downtown-commercial-projects/</link>
	<description>The Latest News from the Community of Del Mar</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 22:23:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Loblaw</title>
		<link>http://www.delmartimes.net/2013/02/20/del-mar-city-council-takes-a-step-back-on-tightening-of-standards-for-downtown-commercial-projects/#comment-1234572</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Loblaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delmartimes.net/?p=45673#comment-1234572</guid>
		<description>So, it appears that the author of this article, Claire Harlan, is clairvoyant (pun intended).  The VSP &quot;...would likely have brought new business to downtown...&quot;.  Ummm, that&#039;s a matter of opinion.  It&#039;s moot anyways, no?  Maybe you should review elements of journalism and try to be more objective next time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, it appears that the author of this article, Claire Harlan, is clairvoyant (pun intended).  The VSP &#8220;&#8230;would likely have brought new business to downtown&#8230;&#8221;.  Ummm, that&#8217;s a matter of opinion.  It&#8217;s moot anyways, no?  Maybe you should review elements of journalism and try to be more objective next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
