Sponsors of Fletcher Cove Initiative responsible for cost of special election

The sponsors of the Fletcher Cove Community Center Party Policy Initiative and those opposing the excessive occupancy, frequency and unlimited alcohol outlined in the Initiative can agree on one thing:  It is a mess — an expensive one for the taxpayers of Solana Beach who must now fork over $250,000 for the special election triggered by the sponsors of the Voter Initiative. Yet that same small group of sponsors who stood before City Council, demanding that the issue go to a city-wide vote, is desperately trying to turn the tables and blame the City Council for the cost of the special election.

History speaks for itself.  In June of 2013, the City Council was faced with a proposal to rent out the Community Center that was excessive and simply not feasible.  The proposal demanded two events per weekend with 100 guests and unlimited alcohol.  The Coastal Commission weighed in and stated that the City could not set aside public parking in the Distillery Lot for these events.  Moreover, an independent traffic study confirmed that there is not enough parking to accommodate parties of more than 50 people.  In addition, the City Council had to consider the effects unlimited alcohol at a family park would have on public safety and the character of Solana Beach.  The proposal, as outlined, was not feasible due to parking, traffic and safety issues.

The City Council worked hard to find a workable solution — one that would not have such major impacts on our beautiful Fletcher Cove Park and beach.  This compromise included fewer people, less frequency and safeguards on alcohol, all in an attempt to reduce parking, traffic, safety and noise problems. Yet despite the fact that City Council established a reasonable Use policy, the sponsors of the Party Policy Initiative continued to push forward with the original policy that was already deemed unworkable.  Mr. Golich, a primary sponsor of the Initiative, stood before City Council on Aug. 7, 2013 and delivered an ultimatum, “…we want a decision made by the voters of Solana Beach.  We encourage the council to adopt the provisions of the initiative rather than the measures under discussion. Short of that, the Friends will continue with the petition drive.”

Even though the City Council established a policy allowing celebrations such as weddings and anniversary parties with alcohol for a nominal fee, sponsors of the Party Policy Initiative claim it isn’t enough and continue to fight for more.  The group hired paid signature gatherers who lied to residents, telling them such things as “the Community Center is closed”; “a couple people who live next door don’t want anyone else to use it”; or “it won’t affect parking because events are only in the evening” — all false statements intended to get people to sign a frivolous initiative.  None of those who signed were told it could cost taxpayers $250,000.  And Mary Jane Boyd and Tom Golich deliberately turned in the signed petition before Nov. 1 to ensure they would get their special election.

The sponsors of the Party Policy Initiative demanded a vote by the people.  Now they are telling residents that the City Council must adopt their Initiative in order to deter the cost of the special election they, themselves, demanded, orchestrated and deliberately triggered when they submitted the signed petition in late August.  Make no mistake, the sponsors of this Initiative wanted a special election and made sure they got one.  They can’t blame anyone for cost but themselves.

Kim Burnett,

Solana Beach

Related posts:

  1. Give the City’s Fletcher Cove Community Center policy a chance
  2. Solana Beach does not need a costly election to establish a private party policy for FCCC
  3. Citizen Group forms in response to Initiative that threatens public access at Fletcher Cov
  4. Local group files voter initiative to allow private events at Fletcher Cove Community Center in Solana Beach
  5. Newly established Solana Beach Council use policy for Fletcher Cove Community Center is a sensible compromise

Short URL: http://www.delmartimes.net/?p=57546

Posted by Staff on Sep 27, 2013. Filed under Letters, Opinion. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Archives

Facebook

Bottom Buttons 1

Bottom Buttons 2

Bottom Buttons 3

Bottom Buttons 4

Bottom Buttons 5

Bottom Buttons 6

LA JOLLA NEWS

RANCHO SANTA FE NEWS

RANCHO SANTA FE NEWS

RSS RANCHO SANTA FE NEWS

  • RSF Association Board Biz: It’s fire season: Be prepared
    The Rancho Santa Fe Fire Protection District (RSFFPD) was officially formed in 1946, in the aftermath of a devastating fire that took place in 1943 and destroyed brush, farmland and homes from Rancho Bernardo through Rancho Santa Fe, all the way to Solana Beach and Del Mar. Today the Fire District spans 38 square miles and protects nearly 30,000 residents. W […]
  • Rancho Santa Fe couple lead way in helping those with thyroid disorders
    Few people may know that Graves’ disease is one of the most common autoimmune diseases afflicting Americans today. Fewer still may know that the only national non-profit dedicated to its patients is headquartered in Rancho Santa Fe. The Graves’ Disease and Thyroid Foundation, co-chaired by Rancho Santa Fe residents Kathleen Bell Flynn and Steve Flynn, has be […]
  • Candidates seek election to three Rancho Santa Fe special district boards
    Seats on the boards of directors of three special districts that provide such services as water, fire protection, sewage treatment and landscape maintenance are on the ballot in the Nov. 4 election. The three special districts are the Santa Fe Irrigation District, the Rancho Santa Fe Fire Protection District and the Rancho Santa Fe Community Services Distric […]