Many reasons to vote ‘No’ on Prop B

Let’s be clear, the Solana Beach City Council did not cause this Special Election.  The Initiative sponsors used deceitful tactics to back the council into a corner and left them with only two choices: (1) Adopt their initiative policy; or (2) Schedule a costly Special Election. The list of reasons against adopting is a mile long, but the council could not find a single reason to stifle democracy.  And that’s why they called for the Special Election.

As Councilmember Zito said at the last meeting, “… it takes a lot of work to force a Special Election,” and “Forcing a Special Election is something that the authors of the petition can choose to do or not.” And that’s exactly what the Initiative sponsors did when they specifically requested a “Special” Election on their Initiative petition and in their letter to the city. This quote from the sponsors’ letter bears repeating, “Additionally we are requesting that a special election be called and scheduled for the earliest possible date after the qualification of this initiative.”

It’s indisputable.  The Initiative sponsors triggered the Special Election, and the cost is on them.  Yet they continue to try to deflect the blame off of themselves.  Their tactic is to confuse voters by omitting and twisting the facts.

Now the proponents of the Party Policy Initiative (on the ballot as Prop B) are harping on a third party report that the city has every right to question. In fact, it’s the responsibility of the council to question any findings they cannot support. As Mayor Nichols explained, the council has received reports and provided opinions to authors many times in the past, especially when important issues are not addressed or disclosed.  The council unanimously agreed that a recent third party report on the impacts of the Initiative failed to address many areas of concern and they provided a list of concerns for our City Attorney to address. Concerns that were not addressed in the report include the lack of parking for parties with 100 guests, potential fiscal obligations the city is expected to face as a result of legal challenges and land use, to name just a few.

Since the first days of cityhood, our City Councils have questioned and often disagreed with the results of numerous environmental studies and reports. Reports that were found unacceptable by the council and community include Kaypro, Magellan/Gateway, I-5 freeway expansion, Vons expansion and the Cedros Crossing/train station project.  It’s hard to imagine that anyone wants a council that is willing to rubberstamp a study or report that would lead to negative impacts for any neighborhood in our city.  After all, in a small town like Solana Beach, nothing affects just one neighborhood; it affects the entire community. Vote “No” on Prop B.

Kelly Harless

Solana Beach

Related posts:

  1. Let Solana Beach City Council set policy for Center
  2. Give voters the opportunity to vote on the Solana Beach Initiative
  3. No way out?
  4. Give the City’s Fletcher Cove Community Center policy a chance
  5. Many reasons to vote No on Prop J

Short URL:

Posted by Staff on Nov 29, 2013. Filed under Letters, Opinion. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply



Bottom Buttons 1

Bottom Buttons 2

Bottom Buttons 3

Bottom Buttons 4

Bottom Buttons 5

Bottom Buttons 6



  • 10 Reasons to Generate Your Own Power
    By Martin Learn, Home Energy Systems As we take one step closer towards August, we all prepare for the blazing sun, the heat it brings, and in turn, the cranked-up AC. But instead of seeing the sun as an enemy, something to be protected against, there is a way to embrace that solar power and […]
  • La Jolla Community Calendar July 24-31
    La Jolla Concerts by the Sea continue 2-4 p.m. Sunday, July 27 with the Bill Magee Blues Band, performing electric New York and Chicago-style blues (preview at Scripps Park at La Jolla Cove. Free. (858) 454-1600. […]
  • FRONTLINE CANCER: The value of Comprehensive Cancer Centers
    It’s estimated that approximately 14 million Americans alive today have had cancer. Some are cancer-free; some are still fighting it. This year, they will be joined by another 1.6 million persons who will receive that fearful diagnosis. The grim news, of course, is that the ranks of cancer patients are also trimmed each year by death: More than 585,000 annua […]