Buying political power in Solana Beach

I am compelled to respond to Kathalyn Nelson’s letter in this paper (Feb 6). No matter how you voted on Prop B, you should be troubled by the “new normal” of politics in Solana Beach, particularly the very large sums of money now being spent on campaigns. An example is the untold amount of money spent to push Prop B. One person, Peter House, essentially funded the Yes on Prop B campaign by contributing more than $93,000 to his political action committee, according to filings with the city so far.

Nelson tries to justify this disturbing change by spinning House’s infusion of the big money that made the Yes on Prop B campaign possible — she claims it is merely philanthropy. This spin is not credible.

What happened to the days when a broad group of citizens raised money in small amounts from many grassroots supporters? Or, what about the recent past when it cost less than $10,000 for a candidate to conduct an entire city council campaign in Solana Beach?

Without House’s money, there would likely not have been the expensive special election that cost our city more than $200,000. After all, Nelson and others acknowledge that House paid the big money for the initiative petitions, legal oversight and the professional paid signature gathers. Also, House’s political action committee named “Citizens for Solana Beach” paid for the high-priced political consultants, mountains of misleading campaign materials that stuffed our mailboxes, the full-page attack ads in this paper, etc. All of this money was spent to influence voters to support his point of view.

There is an agenda for House’s money; he did not spend it for nothing. I see it as an effort to create a wedge issue, and it is divisive. Others have mentioned in the media that the Yes on Prop B campaign was hijacked and designed to attack our present city council members and create discontent and leverage in preparation for the 2014 city council campaign. It is noteworthy that much of the House-funded newspaper ads and campaign materials focused on attacking the current city council members rather than the merits of Prop B.

Nelson conveniently leaves out important information about House’s local political activities and interests. House worked to formulate and campaigned to support the failed 2010 election to impose a new tax on Solana Beach businesses. Although House publicly supported the council’s work to rebuild the Highway 101 business district before the 2012 election, when it came time for the 2012 council election, he worked to support the three defeated council candidates that personally attacked the current council members for spending the money to revitalize the Highway 101 business district. There is also House’s divisive involvement in a Highway 101 merchants group, the Chamber of Commerce, and his efforts to contribute money to city and charitable projects in order to acquire political relevance.

Nelson’s letter is a calculated effort to minimize voter disgust with the infusion of big money in our city’s politics. I wouldn’t be surprised if House’s political consultants had a hand in Nelson’s letter.

Wake up, citizens of Solana Beach. Our city has accomplished a lot in the past few years to improve and protect the quality of life here, but it can be lost. Big money is at work to influence and change our future.

Bart Ziegler

Solana Beach

Related posts:

  1. Don’t be fooled by ‘deceptive advertising’
  2. Process designed for major issues, not ‘political football’
  3. The Soul of Solana Beach
  4. Let Solana Beach City Council set policy for Center
  5. Solana Beach City Council needs to take a strong stand and refuse to adopt the initiative

Short URL:

Posted by Staff on Mar 1, 2014. Filed under Letters, Opinion. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

2 Comments for “Buying political power in Solana Beach”

  1. Mike Bonwell

    It appears House has already accomished a greater goal than Prop B, being publicly acknowledged and in the topic of conversation when it comes to Solana Beach politics.

    If you diminish what ever authority he thinks he has by not associating his name with the city or any type of government, you would be affecting him in a greater deal than to publish his recent works or monetary donations even if it is in a negative contex.

  2. Mr Ziegler has a pretty low opinion of the 1700+ citizens of Solana Beach who voted for the Proposition and against the sitting Council. Count me among MANY Solana Beach voters who can read the voter guides and the letters for and against the proposition, and engage my neighbors in a meaningful dialogue about civic issues.

    The First Amendment matters, Mr Ziegler.

Leave a Reply



Bottom Buttons 1

Bottom Buttons 2

Bottom Buttons 3

Bottom Buttons 4

Bottom Buttons 5

Bottom Buttons 6






  • Rancho Santa Fe Republican Women to present candidates forum
    The Rancho Santa Fe Republican Women, Fed., members will present Republican candidates for federal, state and local races at their “Best Party in Town” event from 3-5 p.m. Sunday, Sept. 21, at the Morgan Run Resort & Club. The candidates have been invited to speak and meet with the voters. Cost is $25; light refreshments will be served. Please send check […]
  • Rancho Santa Fe Library to present Alzheimer’s series
    Taking aim at Alzheimer’s, the county Board of Supervisors in May launched the Alzheimer’s Project, an effort to create a regional strategy to improve caregiver resources and to support research efforts to find better treatments and ultimately, a cure for the disease. […]
  • Rancho Santa Fe Invasive Plants and Better Alternatives
    By Steve Jacobs, Nature Designs In California we are lucky to live in a mild climate that allows us to grow amazing landscapes. Because of this mild climate, plants from other parts of the world often thrive; and some grow so well they become known as invasive. These plants ‘jump fences’ and ‘throw seeds.’ Their […]